Opinion
No. 04-04-00600-CR
Delivered and Filed: September 28, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH.
Appeal from the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2003CR9729, Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.
Sitting: Sarah B. DUNCAN, Justice, Karen ANGELINI, Justice, Sandee Bryan MARION, Justice.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After a trial on the merits, Kermit Brual was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance and was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment and a fine of $2,500.00. Brual timely filed a notice of appeal. His court-appointed appellate attorney has filed a brief in which he raises several arguable issues, but nonetheless concludes that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and motion to withdraw and was further informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Brual has filed a pro se brief raising several issues. However, after reviewing the record, counsel's brief, and Brual's pro se brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Furthermore, we GRANT the motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns 924 S.W.2d at 177 n. 1.