From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BROZ v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 5, 2008
Case No. 3:07cv204/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:07cv204/RV/EMT.

May 5, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated April 1, 2008. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, this action is DISMISSED, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

BROZ v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
May 5, 2008
Case No. 3:07cv204/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2008)
Case details for

BROZ v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:JOHN L. BROZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of the Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: May 5, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:07cv204/RV/EMT (N.D. Fla. May. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Colvin

Likewise, other opinions indicate that even a treating physician's retrospective opinion may be rejected if…

Swartz v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff's medical records do not even include a recommendation that plaintiff lose weight. Courts have…