From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brownridge v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Dec 8, 1998
985 S.W.2d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 72930.

OPINION FILED: December 8, 1998. Motion for Rehearing and\or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 18, 1999.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE DAVID C. MASON, JUDGE.

David Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon; Att. Gen., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Hoff, P.J. and Gaertner and Russell, JJ.


ORDER


Jerome Brownridge (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brownridge v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR
Dec 8, 1998
985 S.W.2d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Brownridge v. State

Case Details

Full title:JEROME BROWNRIDGE, MOVANT, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR

Date published: Dec 8, 1998

Citations

985 S.W.2d 355 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)