From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brownlee v. Kane

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2006
1:05-CV-0949 REC SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)

Opinion

1:05-CV-0949 REC SMS HC.

February 10, 2006


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT Order Adopting Findings and Recommendation [Doc. #9]. Order Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. #1].


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On December 2, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that recommended the petition be DISMISSED as successive. The Magistrate Judge further Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order.

On January 6, 2006, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file and having considered the objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation is supported by the record and proper analysis, and there is no need to modify the Findings and Recommendations based on the points raised in the objections.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendation issued December 2, 2005, is ADOPTED IN FULL;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED; and
3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brownlee v. Kane

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2006
1:05-CV-0949 REC SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Brownlee v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:TERRENCE BROWNLEE, Petitioner, v. A.P. KANE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2006

Citations

1:05-CV-0949 REC SMS HC (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2006)