From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Browning v. Favreau

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B
Aug 5, 1952
60 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1952)

Summary

In Brown the First District Court of Appeal refers to Chestnut v. Chestnut, 160 Fla. 83, 33 So.2d 730 (1948) for the proposition that basically alimony is awarded on the theory that marriage is a partnership to which the wife has made a contribution, and refers to Beard v. Beard, 262 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), and Thigpen v. Thigpen, 277 So.2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), as examples where that court had approved trial court rulings equally dividing the material asserts of the marital venture.

Summary of this case from Gorman v. Gorman

Opinion

August 5, 1952.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, N. Vernon Hawthorne, J.

Jeptha P. Marchant, Joseph A. Perkins and Breslow Gelb, Miami, for appellant.

John C. Sullivan and Benjamin E. Carey, Miami, for appellee.


Nancy Favreau is ten years of age. She is the daughter of Francis Favreau and Barbara Favreau. Her father and mother were married and divorced in the State of Massachusetts. Custody of Nancy was awarded to the mother, Barbara Favreau. She, with the child, moved to Florida. In the year 1948 the mother married Oliver J. Browning. On or about April 2, 1952, the mother died. Since the death of the mother Nancy has been in the custody of her step-father, Oliver J. Browning. Browning, after the death of the mother, filed petition for adoption of Nancy.

Before the adoption proceedings could be completed the father, Francis Favreau, hastened to Florida and instituted this proceeding for the custody of the child. The lower Court awarded custody, after a speeded up hearing, to Francis Favreau, the appellee here. The lower Court refused to grant supersedeas and, on application made, this Court granted a stay of proceedings. More than two hundred pages of testimony are in the record and reflect a factual situation substantially the same as is outlined at great length in the case of Steets v. Gammarino, Fla., 59 So.2d 520.

In view of the similarity of the facts in the two cases we deem it unnecessary to outline in detail the facts here involved.

The decree appealed from is reversed on the authority of Steets v. Gammarino, supra, with instructions to dismiss the bill of complaint in this cause, but without prejudice to appellee to institute such proceedings in the future as he may be advised and to make such defense as he can and desires to make in the adoption proceedings now pending on petition of appellant for the adoption of the child, Nancy Favreau.

It is so ordered.

SEBRING, C.J., and TERRELL and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Browning v. Favreau

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B
Aug 5, 1952
60 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1952)

In Brown the First District Court of Appeal refers to Chestnut v. Chestnut, 160 Fla. 83, 33 So.2d 730 (1948) for the proposition that basically alimony is awarded on the theory that marriage is a partnership to which the wife has made a contribution, and refers to Beard v. Beard, 262 So.2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), and Thigpen v. Thigpen, 277 So.2d 583 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973), as examples where that court had approved trial court rulings equally dividing the material asserts of the marital venture.

Summary of this case from Gorman v. Gorman

In Brown the court then considered the property distribution problem that is involved in the dissolution of a marital partnership when assets have been accumulated during the marriage in the name of one party whose efforts have been away from the home earning money and accumulating assets while the other party has directly contributed services as a homemaker providing for the living needs and comforts of both partners and their children.

Summary of this case from Gorman v. Gorman
Case details for

Browning v. Favreau

Case Details

Full title:BROWNING v. FAVREAU

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B

Date published: Aug 5, 1952

Citations

60 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 1952)

Citing Cases

Wiggins v. Rolls

The matter of what might appear to be for the best interests of a minor in determining temporary or prolonged…

De Walt v. De Walt

The matter of what might appear to be for the best interests of a minor in determining temporary or prolonged…