From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP. v. FDA

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 10, 1998
161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 97-1604, 97-1605, 97-1614, 97-1606, 97-1581.

Filed: November 10, 1998.


ORDER

On a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc there voted in favor of rehearing en banc Judges Murnaghan, M. Blane Michael and Motz, and there voted against rehearing en banc Judges Widener, Ervin, Niemeyer, Luttig, Williams and Traxler.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc shall be, and it hereby is, denied.

The panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of opinion it is without merit.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing shall be, and it hereby is, denied.

With the concurrence of Judge James H. Michael.

Judge Hall dissents. He would grant the petition for rehearing for the reasons expressed in his separate opinion filed with the opinion of the panel.

/s/ H. E. Widener, Jr.

For the Court

Chief Judge Wilkinson, and Judges Wilkins, Hamilton and King, being disqualified, did not participate in this decision.


Summaries of

BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP. v. FDA

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 10, 1998
161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP. v. FDA

Case Details

Full title:BROWN WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION; LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY; PHILIP…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 10, 1998

Citations

161 F.3d 764 (4th Cir. 1998)