From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0130 CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0130 CMK P.

February 10, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Fresno County Superior Court. Fresno County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721


Summaries of

Brown v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2010
No. CIV S-10-0130 CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:JAMES RAY BROWN, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0130 CMK P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2010)