From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Woodbury Auto Grp.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 21, 2023
3:21-cv-00955 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00955

02-21-2023

KEVIN BROWN, Plaintiff, v. WOODBURY AUTO GROUP, et al., Defendants.


FRENSLEY MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ORDER

WILLIAM L.CAMPBELL,M. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge Frensley's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 35), which was filed on January 30, 2023. Through the Report and Recommendation, Judge Frensley recommends that Plaintiff's Application for Temporary Restraining Order with Equitable Relief and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue (Doc. No. 20) be denied. Although the Report and Recommendation advised the parties that any objections must be filed within 14 days of service, no objections have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and concludes it should be adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's application (Doc. No. 20) is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Woodbury Auto Grp.

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Feb 21, 2023
3:21-cv-00955 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Brown v. Woodbury Auto Grp.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN BROWN, Plaintiff, v. WOODBURY AUTO GROUP, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Feb 21, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-00955 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 21, 2023)