From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Wilson

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana
Nov 30, 2006
CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-771 TS (N.D. Ind. Nov. 30, 2006)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-771 TS.

November 30, 2006


OPINION AND ORDER


Petitioner Francisco Brown, a pro se prisoner, filed this habeas corpus petition challenging a guilty finding by the Disciplinary Hearing Board ("DHB") at the Westville Correctional Center on September 22, 2006. Mr. Brown contends that this guilty finding deprived him of the ability to request 25% of his good time credit back from the Commissioner. Mr. Brown asserts that the DHB violated the Adult Disciplinary Procedure because it did not hold a rehearing within seven days of the order from the final reviewing authority.

Habeas corpus relief is only available for the violation of a federal right. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). This court cannot grant habeas corpus relief based on the violation of a prison rule, such as that alleged in the Petition. See Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62 (1991).

If it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court, the judge must dismiss the petition and direct the clerk to notify the petitioner.

Section 2254 Habeas Corpus Rule 4.

For the foregoing reasons, the habeas corpus petition is DISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Wilson

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana
Nov 30, 2006
CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-771 TS (N.D. Ind. Nov. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO BROWN, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM WILSON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana

Date published: Nov 30, 2006

Citations

CAUSE NO. 3:06-CV-771 TS (N.D. Ind. Nov. 30, 2006)