From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-cv-0032-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-cv-0032-WJM-BNB

12-02-2014

D. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY JEFF WILSON, DETECTIVE JARED DENNIS, DEPUTY CORNELL, SHERIFF JOHN MINOR, and OTHER DEPUTIES UNKNOWN NAMES TO ENTER AT A LATER DATE, Defendant.


Judge William J. Martínez

ORDER ADOPTING NOVEMBER 5, 2014 RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

This matter is before the Court on the November 5, 2014 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland (the "Recommendation") (ECF No. 78) that Defendants Detective Jared Dennis, Deputy Cornell, and Sheriff John Minor's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) be denied. The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF No. 78, at 9 n.3.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation have to date been received.

The Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's analysis was thorough and sound, and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note ("When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation."); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) ("In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate.").

In accordance with the foregoing, the Court ORDERS as follows: (1) The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (ECF No. 78) is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) Defendants Jared Dennis, Deputy Cornell, and Sheriff John Minor's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 43) is GRANTED; and (3) Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. 11) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay her or his own attorney's fees and costs.

Dated this 2nd day of December, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

William J. Martínez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-cv-0032-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Brown v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:D. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY JEFF WILSON, DETECTIVE JARED DENNIS, DEPUTY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 2, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-cv-0032-WJM-BNB (D. Colo. Dec. 2, 2014)