From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2013
2:13-CV-00253-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

2:13-CV-00253-GMN-NJK

03-14-2013

HOWARD VINCENT BROWN, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Howard Vincent Brown has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus as well as a motion for appointment of counsel. Based on the current information about petitioner's financial status, including any additional information he may have provided, the court finds that he is able to pay the full fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without having to prepay the full filing fee (ECF #3) is DENIED. Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the date this order is ENTERED in which to have the designated fee sent to the Clerk. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is directed to RETAIN the petition but not file it at this time.

______________________

Gloria M. Navarro

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 14, 2013
2:13-CV-00253-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Brown v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD VINCENT BROWN, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

2:13-CV-00253-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 14, 2013)