From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 11, 2018
Case No. CV 16-1745-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 11, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-1745-FMO (JEM)

05-11-2018

STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DR. WILBUR WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the FAC pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 is denied; (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in all other respects; and (3) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: May 11, 2018

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 11, 2018
Case No. CV 16-1745-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DR. WILBUR WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 11, 2018

Citations

Case No. CV 16-1745-FMO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 11, 2018)