From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Whitaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1526 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1526 KJN P

09-12-2011

BRIAN R. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. C/O WHITAKER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. No. 5.) By order filed July 27, 2011, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Whitaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 12, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1526 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Whitaker

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN R. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. C/O WHITAKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 12, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1526 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 12, 2011)