From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-03883 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-03883 WHA

11-17-2011

ELLIS BROWN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING

On September 2, 2011, this action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On October 27, defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., renoticed its motion to dismiss and accompanying request for judicial notice. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion was due November 10. None was filed. Accordingly, pro se plaintiff Ellis Brown is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his claims against defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. should not be dismissed for failure to oppose the motion. Plaintiff Brown must file a written response to this order by DECEMBER 8, 2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the motion may be granted. The motion hearing previously set for December 1, is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM ALSUP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 17, 2011
No. C 11-03883 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:ELLIS BROWN, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 17, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-03883 WHA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 17, 2011)