From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Apr 23, 2019
C.A. No. 8:19-546-HMH-JDA (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2019)

Opinion

C.A. No. 8:19-546-HMH-JDA

04-23-2019

Tony Tykwon Brown, Petitioner, v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg, Respondent.


OPINION & ORDER

This matter is before the court for review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which specific objection is made, and the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge or recommit the matter with instructions. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2006).

The Petitioner filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation. In the absence of objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). The court must "only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).

After a thorough review of the Report and Recommendation and the record in this case, the court adopts Magistrate Judge Austin's Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is therefore

ORDERED that the petition, docket number 1, is dismissed without prejudice and without requiring the Respondent to file an answer or return.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Henry M. Herlong, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge Greenville, South Carolina
April 23, 2019

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The Petitioner is hereby notified that he has the right to appeal this order within sixty (60) days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Brown v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Apr 23, 2019
C.A. No. 8:19-546-HMH-JDA (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg

Case Details

Full title:Tony Tykwon Brown, Petitioner, v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2019

Citations

C.A. No. 8:19-546-HMH-JDA (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2019)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fitch

Venue is likewise proper because Petitioner's custodian was located in this district when he filed the…

Villagomez v. Knight

Although Petitioner may be frustrated with this process, the risk and needs assessment system being…