From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Walmart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 11, 2020
Case No. 6:19-cv-296-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 6:19-cv-296-JDK-KNM

09-11-2020

DEBBIE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. WALMART #6467, et al., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 15, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 19), recommending that the claims against James Bozard, Matt Morrow and Misty Bhatty be dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff by certified and regular mail. No written objections have been filed.

This Court reviews the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge de novo only if a party objects within fourteen days of service of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In conducting a de novo review, the Court examines the entire record and makes an independent assessment under the law. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded on other grounds by statute, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (extending the time to file objections from ten to fourteen days). Here, Plaintiff did not file objections. The Court therefore reviews the Magistrate Judge's findings for clear error or abuse of discretion and reviews her legal conclusions to determine whether they are contrary to law. See United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219, 1221 (5th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989) (holding that, if no objections to a Magistrate Judge's Report are filed, the standard of review is "clearly erroneous, abuse of discretion and contrary to law").

Having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error or abuse of discretion and no conclusions contrary to law. The Court therefore adopts the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 19) as the findings of this Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 19) is ADOPTED. The claims against Defendants James Bozard, Matt Morrow, and Misty Bhatty are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11th day of September, 2020.

/s/_________

JEREMY D. KERNODLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Walmart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Sep 11, 2020
Case No. 6:19-cv-296-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2020)
Case details for

Brown v. Walmart

Case Details

Full title:DEBBIE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. WALMART #6467, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

Date published: Sep 11, 2020

Citations

Case No. 6:19-cv-296-JDK-KNM (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2020)