From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Wachovia Bank

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 26, 2008
No. 07-5188 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-5188.

Filed On: February 26, 2008.

BEFORE: Randolph, Tatel, and Garland, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel; and the order to show cause issued November 30, 2007, the responses thereto, and the reply, it is.

ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is.

FURTHER ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is.

FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of the district court be affirmed. Appellant's claims against Kennedy Thompson and Wachovia Bank are barred by the statute of limitations. See Rotella v. Wood, 528 U.S. 549, 552-54 (2000). Furthermore, this court has discretion to consider the limitations issue whether or not it was timely raised by Thompson and Wachovia Bank. Cf. Acree v. Republic of Iraq, 370 F.3d 41, 58 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Macy v. Hopkins County School Bd. of Educ., 484 F.3d 357, 367 n. 5 (6th Cir. 2007).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.


Summaries of

Brown v. Wachovia Bank

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Feb 26, 2008
No. 07-5188 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Wachovia Bank

Case Details

Full title:Emanuel Brown, Appellant v. Wachovia Bank, et al., Appellees

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

No. 07-5188 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 26, 2008)

Citing Cases

Youkelsone v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

See15 U.S.C. § 1640(e); cf. Dubois, 2010 WL 3463368, at *6 (dismissing federal law claims against…