From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. U.S. Postal Service

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 31, 2010
Case No. 3:10 CV 201 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 3:10 CV 201.

March 31, 2010


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


The Court conducted a record hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 3) on March 30, 2010. Counsel and parties present: Pro Se Plaintiff Deborah Brown (and William Gertz); Guillermo Rojas, attorney for Defendant. This case (removed from Small Claims Court) involves a claim against the Postal Service for losing a Christmas package sent from Ohio to California in December 2009 (Doc. No. 1-1).

Defendant's Motion (unopposed) is granted. First, to properly plead an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), the United States must be named as the defendant. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679(a); see also Griffin v. United States Postal Serv., 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8617, at *1 (6th Cir. April 30, 1999). Second, even if Plaintiff had properly named the United States as the defendant, the United States has expressly retained its sovereign immunity over claims for negligent handling of the mail which are filed under the FTCA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(b); see also Griffin, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8617, at *1.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. U.S. Postal Service

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 31, 2010
Case No. 3:10 CV 201 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. U.S. Postal Service

Case Details

Full title:Deborah A. Brown, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Postal Service, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2010

Citations

Case No. 3:10 CV 201 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 31, 2010)