From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jun 9, 1950
182 F.2d 933 (8th Cir. 1950)

Opinion

No. 14,076.

June 9, 1950.

Frederick W. Lehmann, St. Louis, Mo. (appointed by the Court) for appellant.

Harry F. Murphy, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo. (Sam M. Wear, U.S. Atty., and David A. Thompson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo. on the brief) for appellee.

Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and RIDDICK, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from an order denying a motion of the appellant for the vacation of a sentence imposed by the District Court on January 17, 1946, upon a plea of guilty entered on behalf of the appellant, in his presence, by counsel appointed for him by the court. The offense with which the appellant was charged was a violation of the Federal Escape Act, § 753h, Title 18 U.S.C. [now 18 U.S.C.A. § 751].

This Court appointed counsel to represent the appellant on this appeal. We are indebted to counsel for a brief and argument which fully present the appellant's contentions in the light most favorable to him.

An examination of the record, however, convinces us that the District Court carefully protected the appellant's rights in the proceedings leading up to the entry of the plea of guilty for him by his counsel; that his counsel competently investigated the appellant's case, did nothing to mislead him, and acted for his best interests; and that the District Court was fully justified in accepting the plea of guilty. The contention, now made, that the appellant desired to enter a plea of not guilty and stand trial, is not borne out by the record. That an attorney for a defendant in a criminal case may, in his presence and on his behalf, enter a plea of guilty for him, is not open to question. United States v. Denniston, 2 Cir., 89 F.2d 696, 698, 110 A.L.R. 1296, certiorari denied 301 U.S. 709, 57 S.Ct. 943, 81 L.Ed. 1362; United States v. Moe Liss, 2 Cir., 105 F.2d 144, 145; Merritt v. Hunter, 10 Cir., 170 F.2d 739, 741; Mayes v. United States, 8 Cir., 177 F.2d 505, 507.

Our conclusion is that the sentence imposed upon the appellant was in all respects a valid one.

The order appealed from is affirmed.


Summaries of

Brown v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Jun 9, 1950
182 F.2d 933 (8th Cir. 1950)
Case details for

Brown v. United States

Case Details

Full title:BROWN v. UNITED STATES

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Jun 9, 1950

Citations

182 F.2d 933 (8th Cir. 1950)

Citing Cases

United States v. Myers

I find no legal merit to this contention. Hairston was present when the plea was entered and made no…

United States v. Bentvena

See Kercheval v. United States, 1927, 274 U.S. 220, 223, 47 S.Ct. 582, 71 L.Ed. 1009; United States v. Morin,…