From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BROWN v. SUNLAND TRAINING CTR., DIV

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 18, 1982
409 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. YY-478.

January 5, 1982. On Rehearing February 18, 1982.

Appeal from the Workers' Compensation.

Peter S. Schwedock, of Pelzner, Schwedock, Finkelstein Klausner, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Jerry V. Wilkey, Coral Gables, for appellees/cross-appellants.


Claimant appeals and the employer/carrier cross-appeal from a workers' compensation order awarding claimant 27% permanent partial disability benefits of the body as a whole due to her partial loss of hearing and orthopedic and psychiatric problems resulting from the two compensable accidents. Although there is competent, substantial evidence to support the award of permanent partial disability benefits, the deputy commissioner erred in failing to determine the date upon which claimant reached total maximum medical improvement as a result of the two accidents. It is improper to begin payment of permanent benefits without a determination of the date of total maximum medical improvement. Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph Company v. Rollins, 390 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); South Carolina Insurance Company v. Blackman, 380 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Therefore, we remand on this point to allow a determination of the date upon which claimant reached total maximum medical improvement for her overall disability on this record.

All other points on appeal and cross-appeal are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.


ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND/OR CLARIFICATION


Appellant's petition for rehearing and/or clarification is granted. We adhere to our opinion remanding the case to the deputy commissioner to allow a determination of the date upon which claimant reached overall maximum medical improvement for the permanent partial disability caused by the two industrial accidents. However, the deputy commissioner may take further evidence as may be absolutely necessary for the limited purpose of determining the date of total maximum medical improvement.

BOOTH, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

BROWN v. SUNLAND TRAINING CTR., DIV

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 18, 1982
409 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

BROWN v. SUNLAND TRAINING CTR., DIV

Case Details

Full title:EARLENE BROWN, APPELLANT, v. SUNLAND TRAINING CENTER, DIVISION OF RISK…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 18, 1982

Citations

409 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Sunland Center at Miami v. Brown

Accordingly, this court reversed and remanded for that determination, stating that the deputy might "take…

Brown v. Sunland Training Center

July 29, 1983. Appeal [after remand, 409 So.2d 1080] from an Order of Deputy Commissioner Alan M. Kuker.…