From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Stuart

United States District Court, D. Utah
Oct 18, 2007
Case No: 2:07-CV-304 PGC (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2007)

Opinion

Case No: 2:07-CV-304 PGC.

October 18, 2007


REPORT RECOMMENDATION


On August 22, 2007, Plaintiff failed to appear for a scheduled court hearing. The court issued an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff was required to file his response by September 28, 2007. To date, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the court's order, and the case is therefore subject to dismissal.

Docket no. 15, filed September 7, 2007.

RECOMMENDATION

The magistrate judge recommends that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Copies of this Report and Recommendation are being mailed to the parties, who are hereby notified that they have the right to object to the Report and Recommendation. The parties are further notified that they must file any objections to the Report and Recommendation with the clerk of the district court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), within ten (10) days after receiving it. Failure to file objections may constitute a waiver of those objections on subsequent appellate review.


Summaries of

Brown v. Stuart

United States District Court, D. Utah
Oct 18, 2007
Case No: 2:07-CV-304 PGC (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2007)
Case details for

Brown v. Stuart

Case Details

Full title:TIRONE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DEAN A. STUART, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah

Date published: Oct 18, 2007

Citations

Case No: 2:07-CV-304 PGC (D. Utah Oct. 18, 2007)