From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Strickland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
May 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 0:15-1251-TMC-PJG (D.S.C. May. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 0:15-1251-TMC-PJG

05-21-2015

Tequan L. Brown, Plaintiff, v. Andy Strickland, Sheriff; Jodie Taylor, Captain, Colleton Co. Sheriff's Ofc.; Matthew Walker, Public Defender, P. Defender Ofc.; Colleton County Sheriff's Office, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civ. Rule 73.02, DSC, this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that Defendant Matthew Walker be dismissed from this case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (ECF No. 14). Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 14 at 5). However, Plaintiff filed no objections to the Report, and the time to do so has now run.

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). In the absence of objections, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983). Rather, "in the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 14) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Matthew Walker is DISMISSED from this case without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
May 21, 2015
Anderson, South Carolina


Summaries of

Brown v. Strickland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION
May 21, 2015
Civil Action No. 0:15-1251-TMC-PJG (D.S.C. May. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Brown v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:Tequan L. Brown, Plaintiff, v. Andy Strickland, Sheriff; Jodie Taylor…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

Date published: May 21, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 0:15-1251-TMC-PJG (D.S.C. May. 21, 2015)