From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 24, 2022
346 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-1433

08-24-2022

Deron Montrell BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Deron Montrell Brown, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Deron Montrell Brown, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

Makar, Nordby, and Long, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 24, 2022
346 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Deron Montrell BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 24, 2022

Citations

346 So. 3d 206 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)