From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 21, 2022
22-CV-688 (DG)(RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-688 (DG)(RLM)

12-21-2022

ARTHUR LAMAR BROWN, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK; THE CITY OF NEW YORK; DEPUTY PAYNE; CAPTAIN HORTON; JOHN DOE # 5, Correction Officer; C.O. JOHN DOE # 6; ARRESTING OFFICER JOHN DOE # 1; ARRESTING OFFICER JOHN DOE # 2; VARIOUS INTAKE C.O. JOHN DOES, OBCC; VARIOUS INTAKE C.O. JOHN DOES, AMKC; ADJUDICATION CAPTAIN JANE DOE # 1; ADJUDICATION CAPTAIN JANE DOE # 2; C.O. JOHN DOE # 10, Bus Driver; CAPTAIN JOHN DOE # 1; C.O. JOHN DOE # 11; C.O. JOHN DOE # 12; and Other Unknown JANE/JOHN DOE Adjudication Captains, All in their Individual and Official Capacities, Defendants.


ORDER

ROANNE L. MANN, United States Magistrate Judge

Pro se plaintiff Arthur Lamar Brown filed the above-captioned Civil Rights Complaint (ECF No. 1), along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 3) and the Prisoner Authorization required by the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (ECF No. 2) in January 2022. By Memorandum and Order dated June 6, 2022, the Honorable Diane Gujarati granted plaintiff's IFP request, dismissed the complaint, and granted leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a lengthy Amended Complaint on July 18, 2022 (ECF No. 11) and a supplemental complaint on August 16, 2022 (ECF No. 13).

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses against each of the named defendants and the United States Marshals Service is directed to serve the summonses and copies of plaintiff's submissions on the named defendants.

Plaintiff also names correctional officers and police officers identified as “John Does” and “Jane Does.” Pursuant to Valentin v. Dinkins, 121 F.3d 72 (2d Cir. 1997), the Court requests that, by January 20, 2023, Corporation Counsel for the City of New York attempt to ascertain the full names and service addresses of the John Doe police officers who were involved in the June or July 2016 incident at 501 New York Avenue that led to plaintiff's indictment under Docket Number 05595-2016 and the corrections officers involved in the January 2017 incidents on Rikers Island. Corporation Counsel need not undertake to defend or indemnify these individuals at this juncture. This Order merely provides a means by which plaintiff may name and properly serve the defendants as instructed by the Second Circuit in Valentin. Once this information is provided, plaintiff's complaint shall be deemed amended to reflect the full name of the John Doe defendants, the Clerk of Court shall prepare a summons for those defendants, and the United States Marshals Service shall serve the summons upon those defendants without prepayment of fees.

The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this Order and the complaint to the New York City Law Department and to plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Dec 21, 2022
22-CV-688 (DG)(RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR LAMAR BROWN, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK; THE CITY OF NEW…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Dec 21, 2022

Citations

22-CV-688 (DG)(RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 21, 2022)