From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 3, 2018
550 S.W.3d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80607

07-03-2018

Jamuahle D. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Damien De Loyola, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Division Three: Victor C. Howard, Presiding Judge, Cynthia L. Martin, Judge and Gary D. Witt, Judge

ORDER

Per curiam:

Jamuahle Brown ("Brown") appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Pettis County, Missouri, denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Brown argues that the motion court erred in denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion because it violated his right to effective assistance of counsel since trial counsel failed to engage in additional cross-examination of one of the State's witness, Jennifer Reyburn ("Reyburn"). We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jul 3, 2018
550 S.W.3d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jamuahle D. BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jul 3, 2018

Citations

550 S.W.3d 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)