From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
May 15, 2018
547 S.W.3d 604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. ED 105604

05-15-2018

Boyce BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Casey A. Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant. Richard A. Starnes, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.


Casey A. Taylor, 1000 West Nifong, Building 7, Suite 100, Columbia, Missouri 65203, for Appellant.

Richard A. Starnes, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102, for Respondent.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J. and Philip M. Hess, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Boyce Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. His sole point on appeal is that the motion court erred in determining that his trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to call an alibi witness. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
May 15, 2018
547 S.W.3d 604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Boyce BROWN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: May 15, 2018

Citations

547 S.W.3d 604 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)