From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 15, 2018
256 So. 3d 820 (Fla. 2018)

Opinion

No. SC16-1031

10-15-2018

Deneal O. BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Dane K. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., St. Petersburg, Florida, for Petitioner Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Suzanne Beschard, Bureau Chief, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent


Dane K. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., St. Petersburg, Florida, for Petitioner

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Suzanne Beschard, Bureau Chief, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Respondent

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Brown v. State , 197 So.3d 69 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016), on the grounds of express and direct conflict with Griffin v. State , 160 So.3d 63 (Fla. 2015), Stinson v. State , 69 So.3d 291 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), and Ward v. State , 12 So.3d 920 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Having considered the Second District's opinion and the briefs of the parties, upon further review, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss review.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and LEWIS, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 15, 2018
256 So. 3d 820 (Fla. 2018)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:DENEAL O. BROWN, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 15, 2018

Citations

256 So. 3d 820 (Fla. 2018)