From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 9, 1990
561 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 87-03180.

May 9, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, James S. Parker, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Wendy Buffington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Darren Brown appeals the denial of his motion to suppress cocaine and the imposition of court costs. We affirm the denial of his motion to suppress, but reverse the imposition of court costs. The trial court did not affirmatively impose costs during the sentencing hearing and was not entitled to do so thereafter in a written order. In order to impose costs, a defendant must have notice and an opportunity to be heard. Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984); Joseph v. State, 556 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In this case, the trial court's comments during the sentencing hearing did not serve as notice that it was imposing costs upon Brown, but merely left the issue open for further determination. Additionally, there was no determination made that Brown had the ability to pay the costs. Although, we affirm the sentence imposed, we reverse the cost provision of Brown's judgment.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 9, 1990
561 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:DARREN L. BROWN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 9, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)