From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jun 18, 2014
439 S.W.3d 929 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. PD–1723–12.

2014-06-18

David Earl BROWN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas.

On State's Motion to Permanently Abate the Appeal After State's Petition Granted, 183rd District Court, Harris County, Angela Vanessa Velasquez, Judge. David C. Newell, Kevin P. Keating, Assistant District Attorneys, Houston, TX, for Appellant. Jani J. Maselli Wood, Harris County Public Defender's Office, Houston, TX, Lisa McMinn, State's Attorney, Austin, for The State.


On State's Motion to Permanently Abate the Appeal After State's Petition Granted, 183rd District Court, Harris County, Angela Vanessa Velasquez, Judge.
David C. Newell, Kevin P. Keating, Assistant District Attorneys, Houston, TX, for Appellant. Jani J. Maselli Wood, Harris County Public Defender's Office, Houston, TX, Lisa McMinn, State's Attorney, Austin, for The State.

OPINION


PER CURIAM.

Appellant was on trial for murder. In the early morning hours of what would have been the final day of trial in the guilt phase, appellant sustained a gunshot wound to the head. After a one-day recess, the trial judge ruled that appellant's absence from trial was voluntary because there was evidence that the injury may have been self-inflicted. The court conducted the remainder of the guilt trial and the entire punishment trial in appellant's absence. Appellant appealed the trial court's refusal to hold a formal hearing to determine whether he was competent to stand trial after sustaining the gunshot wound. The appellate court held that appellant should have been granted a competency hearing before the jury made its guilt determination and remanded the cause for a new trial. B rown v. State, 393 S.W.3d 308 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2012). This decision remained unchanged after rehearing. B rown v. State, 393 S.W.3d 308, 315 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2012) (op. on reh'g). We granted the state's petition for discretionary review on four grounds. Finding that the trial court did not follow relevant procedures set out in Texas statutes and Supreme Court precedent, we remanded to thatcourt on March 19, 2014, for a retrospective competency hearing. On May 6, 2014, the State filed a motion to rehear our opinion.

Appellant has died, however, and the State has now moved to permanently abate the appeal. The State's motion is granted. The State's motion for rehearing and the State's petition for discretionary review to this Court are dismissed and the opinion issued on March 19, 2014 withdrawn. The First Court of Appeals is ordered to withdraw its opinion and permanently abate the appeal. See Ex parte Hunter, 297 S.W.3d 292 (Tex.Crim.App.2009) and Vargas v. State, 659 S.W.2d 422 (Tex.Crim.App.1983).




Summaries of

Brown v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Jun 18, 2014
439 S.W.3d 929 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Earl BROWN, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Date published: Jun 18, 2014

Citations

439 S.W.3d 929 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Trotti v. State

The majority’s improper commingling of the issues of incompetency and voluntary absence from trial revives…

Trotti v. State

revives an issue from Brown v. State, in which our sister court considered whether a criminal defendant's…