Opinion
No. 05-04-01113-CR
Opinion Filed January 23, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-58451-JW. Affirmed.
Before Justices O'NEILL, FITZGERALD, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Willard Lee Brown appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery enhanced by two prior felony convictions. Before a jury, appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and true to the enhancement allegations. The jury assessed appellant's punishment at thirty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, filed a pro se response. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, PD-300-04, 2005 WL 3057799 (Tex.Crim.App. Nov. 16, 2005). We affirm the trial court's judgment.