From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 23, 2006
No. 05-04-01113-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-04-01113-CR

Opinion Filed January 23, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F03-58451-JW. Affirmed.

Before Justices O'NEILL, FITZGERALD, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Willard Lee Brown appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery enhanced by two prior felony convictions. Before a jury, appellant pleaded guilty to the charge and true to the enhancement allegations. The jury assessed appellant's punishment at thirty-five years' imprisonment. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, filed a pro se response. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, PD-300-04, 2005 WL 3057799 (Tex.Crim.App. Nov. 16, 2005). We affirm the trial court's judgment.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Jan 23, 2006
No. 05-04-01113-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 23, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLARD LEE BROWN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Jan 23, 2006

Citations

No. 05-04-01113-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 23, 2006)