From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 19, 2006
208 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 87088.

December 19, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Cause No. 03P-4395, Jimmie M. Edwards, Judge.

Jo Ann Rotermund; Missouri Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Dora A. Fichter; Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before BOOKER T. SHAW, C.J. and MARY K. HOFF, J., and PATRICIA L. COHEN, J.


ORDER


Ronnie Brown (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule, 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because Movant established that the plea court failed to inform him of the maximum range of punishment for armed criminal action as required by Rule 24.02. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Brown v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Dec 19, 2006
208 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ronnie BROWN, Defendant/Movant, v. STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Dec 19, 2006

Citations

208 S.W.3d 921 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Purkett

The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the decision solely as to the point appealed. (Doc. 11, Ex. 5); Brown…