From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 12, 1995
655 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-1676.

April 28, 1995. Rehearing Denied June 12, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, John W. Watson, III, J.

Craig Stephen Boda, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The one issue raised on appeal that has detained us is the question whether the lower court erred in refusing to permit appellant to reopen the defense case to offer testimony of Daniel McDonald. McDonald would have testified that Steven Ryan, one of the victims, had threatened him with a weapon in an incident that occurred in October or November 1988. Although this testimony is reminiscent of appellant's version of events preceding the homicides of Steven and Deborah Ryan on November 8, 1990, the lower court decided to exclude the evidence because its principal effect was to show a propensity for violence on the part of Steven Ryan. It is clear that Brown was not aware of this incident with McDonald prior to the Ryans being killed by Brown. Weighing the dissimilarities as well as the similarities between the two incidents and given the court's expressed concern about the potential for such evidence to confuse the jury, we cannot say the court abused its discretion in refusing to admit this evidence.

AFFIRMED.

COBB, GRIFFIN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 12, 1995
655 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:KEITH OLIVER BROWN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 12, 1995

Citations

655 So. 2d 1161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)