From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 12, 1980
389 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. NN-352.

October 7, 1980. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Henry Clay Mitchell, Jr., J.

Michael Minerva, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lynda Campbell, Legal Intern, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Brown appeals his conviction on a charge of sexual battery. Because Brown has not demonstrated reversible error, we affirm.

Brown is correct that the trial judge erred in admitting into evidence a doctor's testimony about the results of two gonorrhea tests. The doctor did not perform the tests, had no personal knowledge of who performed the tests, and was unaware of the process by which the samples left the hospital for a state laboratory, and returned as test reports. The test results were total hearsay and should not have been admitted into evidence. The doctor clearly was not a "custodian or other qualified witness" as contemplated in Florida's Uniform Business Records as Evidence Act, Fla. Stat. § 92.36, which was controlling at this trial.

However, given the totality of the evidence, this error was harmless. Fla. Stat. § 924.33.

The other issues raised by Brown are without merit and do not warrant discussion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

MILLS, C.J., and McCORD and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Nov 12, 1980
389 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Brown v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUNNY BROWN, JR., APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Nov 12, 1980

Citations

389 So. 2d 269 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Waterfall Vict. Grantor Tr. II v. McDonald

As the former attorney did not have personal knowledge of the elements necessary to establish a business…

Tejeda-Bermudez v. State

If there was error in admitting the blood-typing evidence, it was harmless. Brown v. State, 389 So.2d 269…