From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Spichiger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2012
CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-158 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-158

01-23-2012

LOIS J. BROWN and CHARLES H. BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL L. SPICHIGER, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

On January 5, 2012, Plaintiffs were granted leave to file a further Amended Complaint by January 19, 2012, alleging diversity of citizenship and adding a claim of rescission. Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint on January 19th, but it still does not allege diversity of citizenship. (Docket # 99.) Therefore, Plaintiffs have up to and including January 30, 2012, to file a Third Amended Complaint that properly alleges the citizenship of the parties. If a Third Amended Complaint is not filed, then the Second Amended Complaint will be subject to dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

_________

Roger B. Cosbey,

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Brown v. Spichiger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION
Jan 23, 2012
CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-158 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Spichiger

Case Details

Full title:LOIS J. BROWN and CHARLES H. BROWN, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL L. SPICHIGER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

Date published: Jan 23, 2012

Citations

CAUSE NO. 1:10-CV-158 (N.D. Ind. Jan. 23, 2012)