From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Sobina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-128E (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2009)

Summary

holding that plaintiff did not show Eighth Amendment violation regarding spoiled food, where there was no evidence that he suffered more than temporary discomfort

Summary of this case from Miller v. Fraley

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-128E.

December 29, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Shawn Lamont Brown's civil rights complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on May 1, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Francis X. Caiazza for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The case has since been referred to Magistrate Judge Cathy Bissoon.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, filed on December 2, 2009, recommended that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 54) be denied, and that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58) be granted. The parties were allowed ten days from the date of service of the report to file objections. A copy of the Report and Recommendation was sent via First Class United States Mail to Plaintiff's place of incarceration. Objections were due on or before December 16, 2009. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2009,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 54) is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58) is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bissoon, (Doc. 75), dated December 2, 2009, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Brown v. Sobina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 29, 2009
Civil Action No. 08-128E (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2009)

holding that plaintiff did not show Eighth Amendment violation regarding spoiled food, where there was no evidence that he suffered more than temporary discomfort

Summary of this case from Miller v. Fraley
Case details for

Brown v. Sobina

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN LAMONT BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SUPERINTENDENT RAYMOND J. SOBINA, et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 29, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-128E (W.D. Pa. Dec. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

Laurensau v. Romarowics

Given these facts, Plaintiff has not established a genuine issue of fact that he was served contaminated food…

Stafford v. DeRose

However, without evidence that spoiled food was frequently served an inmate plaintiff cannot establish a…