Other Courts have reached this same conclusion in circumstances materially similar to the present case. See, e.g., Alvarado-Ortiz v. FPC Yankton, No. 22-cv-206 (NEB/ECW), 2022 WL 4358112, at *2 (D. Minn. July 27, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2022 WL 4357544 (D. Minn. Sept. 20, 2022); Huey v. United States, No. 20-cv-1538 (PAM/ECW), 2021 WL 1842283, at *2 (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 1840027 (D. Minn. May 7, 2021); Brown v. Segal, No. 22-cv-3183 (PAM/LIB), 2023 WL 4034599, at *2 (D. Minn. May 23, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 4034423 (D. Minn. June 15, 2023); see also e.g., Miller v. Whitehead, 527 F.3d 752, 756 (8th Cir. 2008) (concluding that habeas petitions are rendered moot because the relief sought in the petitions had already been granted).
Other Court have reached this same conclusion in circumstances materially similar to the present case. See, e.g., Alvarado-Ortiz v. FPC Yankton, No. 22-cv-206 (NEB/ECW), 2022 WL 4358112, at *2 (D. Minn. July 27, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2022 WL 4357544 (D. Minn. Sept. 20, 2022); Stegient v. Wilson, No. 3:20-cv-03523, 2021 WL 6339267, at *2 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 12, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2022 WL 93936 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2022); Huey v. United States, No. 20-cv-1538 (PAM/ECW), 2021 WL 1842283, at *2 (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 1840027 (D. Minn. May 7, 2021); Brown v. Segal, No. 22-cv-3183 (PAM/LIB), 2023 WL 4034599, at *2 (D. Minn. May 23, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 4034423 (D. Minn. June 15, 2023); Tompkins v. Hawkins, No. 20-cv-3829, 2021 WL 3478213, at *2 (S.D. Tex. July 23, 2021); Doyle v. Yates, No. 2:23-cv-47, 2023 WL 4056491, at *1 (E.D. Ark. May 8, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 4054675 (E.D. Ark. June 16, 2023); Craft v. Eischen, No. 22-cv-1897 (KMM/TNL), 2023 WL 3467231, at *3 (D. Minn. Apr. 17, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 3455443 (D. Minn. May 15, 2023); Scheper v. Rios, No. 19-cv-402 (MJD/ECW), 2020 WL 4060729, at *2 (D. Minn. June 5, 2020), report and recommendation adopted, 2020 WL 4059875 (D. Minn. July 20, 2020).Therefore, the present Petition is moot because there is no longer any live case or controversy to be resolved in the present case.