From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Saline County Board of County Commissioners

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 23, 2008
CIVIL ACTION No. 07-3265-SAC (D. Kan. May. 23, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-3265-SAC.

May 23, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a prisoner confined in the Saline County Detention Center in Salina, Kansas, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis on a civil complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

In this action, plaintiff alleges the computers and software purchased by Saline County, and the technical support provided by the United States postal office in Salina, are being used to document all prisoner mail and to provide information therein to the courts and to county prosecutors. Plaintiff broadly contends the jail now has the power to open all incoming and outgoing mail for any reason, and further contends he now has no way to protect written information to and from his attorney. On these allegations of speculative harm, plaintiff seeks damages from the Saline County Board of County Commissioners, the Saline County Jail, and the "Saline County Post Office."

By an order dated November 19, 2007, the court directed plaintiff to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed as stating no claim for relief because the Saline County Jail is not a legal entity that can be sued, because any claim against the "Saline County Post Office" would in effect be a claim against the United States rather than a "person acting under color of state law" for purposes of proceeding under § 1983, and because plaintiff's allegations fail to satisfy the requirements for establishing any municipal liability against the Saline County Board of County Commissioners.

In response, plaintiff does not address these identified deficiencies. As in his other pending case, plaintiff cites his lack of education and renews his request for appointment of counsel. The court denies this request.

Plaintiff also requests that if his case is dismissed, that he be allowed to appeal to the United States Supreme Court. Plaintiff is advised that a timely notice of appeal from the final order and judgment entered in this matter must be filed in this court, see Fed.R.App.P. 4, and that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals will have jurisdiction over such an appeal. Plaintiff is further advised that there is a $455.00 fee to file an appeal. If plaintiff is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal without prepayment of that appellate filing fee, plaintiff will be required to pay the full $455.00 fee as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2).

Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and in the show cause order entered on November 19, 2007, the court concludes the complaint should be dismissed as stating no claim for relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) ("Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action . . . fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted").

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the complaint is dismissed as stating no claim for relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Saline County Board of County Commissioners

United States District Court, D. Kansas
May 23, 2008
CIVIL ACTION No. 07-3265-SAC (D. Kan. May. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Saline County Board of County Commissioners

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL TRENT BROWN, Plaintiff, v. SALINE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Kansas

Date published: May 23, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 07-3265-SAC (D. Kan. May. 23, 2008)