From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1991
172 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 1, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is within the discretion of the trial court "in the interests of justice to excuse delay or default resulting from law office failure" (CPLR 2005). A court will vacate such a default upon a showing of a meritorious cause of action, a justifiable excuse for the default and absence of willfulness (see, Goldstein Affiliates v. Len Art Knitting Corp., 75 A.D.2d 551). In the matter at bar, the plaintiffs' counsel submitted an affidavit explaining how a clerical oversight, constituting law office failure, had caused the default at issue, while one of the plaintiffs submitted an affidavit of merit. In a proper exercise of its discretion, the trial court concluded that this showing was sufficient (cf., Fidelity Deposit Co. v. Andersen Co., 60 N.Y.2d 693). Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1991
172 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Brown v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TONY BROWN et al., Respondents, v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC., Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
567 N.Y.S.2d 831

Citing Cases

Van Kleeck v. Horton Memorial Hospital

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the plaintiffs' motion is denied, and the…

Tae Young Lee v. Vill. of Airmont

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the evidence they submitted failed to establish a reasonable excuse…