From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1901
58 App. Div. 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

Opinion

February Term, 1901.

G.S.P. Stillman, for the appellant.

John T. Sackett, for the respondents.


The Code of Civil Procedure (§ 887) regulates strictly these applications and permits them to be granted only when it appears that the witness is not "within the State." The fact that it appears only that the proposed witness is a non-resident, while her whereabouts is not stated, is not a compliance with that statute. ( Matter of Adams, 31 App. Div. 298.) For the want of that necessary allegation this order must be affirmed, without prejudice, however, to another application upon proper papers.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

VAN BRUNT, P.J., O'BRIEN, INGRAHAM and McLAUGHLIN, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Brown v. Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1901
58 App. Div. 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
Case details for

Brown v. Russell

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES E. BROWN, Trustee, Appellant, v . JOHN W. RUSSELL and FRANCES M.R…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1901

Citations

58 App. Div. 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
68 N.Y.S. 755

Citing Cases

Werres v. Days

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, upon the…