From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Robinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2019
No. 18-6807 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-6807

01-22-2019

TYRELL O'NEAL BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON, Commonwealth Superintendent; TED HALL, Respondents - Appellees.

Tyrell O'Neal Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00135-HEH-RCY) Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tyrell O'Neal Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrell O'Neal Brown, a state prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition for failure to pay the filing fee. Review of the district court's docket reveals that, shortly after the district court entered the dismissal order, Brown paid the filing fee. The district court subsequently reinstated Brown's § 2241 petition, albeit under a new case number. See Brown v. Robinson, No. 3:18-cv-00135-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va., PACER No. 12). By virtue of this order, the district court effectively granted Brown the only relief he could have obtained by way of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as moot. See CVLR Performance Horses, Inc. v. Wynne, 792 F.3d 469, 474 (4th Cir. 2015) ("Litigation may become moot during the pendency of an appeal when an intervening event makes it impossible for the court to grant effective relief to the prevailing party."). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Although a certificate of appealability generally is required to appeal "the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012), we conclude that no certificate of appealability is required here because the district court's dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee is unrelated to the merits of the § 2241 petition. See Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009); United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 399-400 (4th Cir. 2015). --------

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Brown v. Robinson

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2019
No. 18-6807 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2019)
Case details for

Brown v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:TYRELL O'NEAL BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 22, 2019

Citations

No. 18-6807 (4th Cir. Jan. 22, 2019)