From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Ricci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jan 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11154-RGS (D. Mass. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11154-RGS

01-10-2012

MICHAEL R. BROWN, Petitioner v. SANDRA RICCI, Respondent


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STEARNS, D.J.

I agree with Magistrate Judge Collings' analysis and his determination that petitioner Michael Brown has failed (perhaps understandably given the complex procedural posture of his case) to exhaust his state remedies in that no constitutional claim cognizable in this court has yet been presented to any state court. Consequently, his Recommendation is ADOPTED and the petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. Any request for the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is DENIED, the court seeing no meritorious or substantial basis supporting an appeal. The Clerk is instructed to close the case.

Petitioner has filed a pro se Objection essentially expressing his frustration with the state court's handling of his appeals, but without impeaching in any fundamental way the Magistrate Judge's conclusions.

SO ORDERED.

Richard G. Stearns

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brown v. Ricci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Jan 10, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11154-RGS (D. Mass. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Ricci

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL R. BROWN, Petitioner v. SANDRA RICCI, Respondent

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-11154-RGS (D. Mass. Jan. 10, 2012)

Citing Cases

Tavares v. Coyne-Fague

However, he presents no legal principle that would bar the Court from proceeding by text order, which is a…

Commonwealth v. Brown

The petition was denied without prejudice on the basis that Brown had failed to exhaust his State court…