From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Reilly

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
2:20-cv-1709 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1709 AC P

09-30-2021

RONNIE CHEROKEE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. A. REILLY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, has moved to compel a settlement agreement. ECF No. 15. The court cannot require parties to settle a case and the motion will therefore be denied. To the extent plaintiff may be attempting to request a settlement conference, the request will also be denied at this time. If, on screening, the court determines that plaintiff has stated cognizable claims and defendants are served, this case will be referred to the Post-Screening ADR Project for a settlement conference unless defendants choose to opt out of the program.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to compel a settlement agreement, ECF No. 15, is DENIED.


Summaries of

Brown v. Reilly

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
2:20-cv-1709 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Brown v. Reilly

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE CHEROKEE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. A. REILLY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1709 AC P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)