From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447 (MTT)

02-27-2012

ANTHONY BERNARD BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CLINTON PERRY and SUSAN KAPLAN, Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Order and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle. (Doc. 7). The Magistrate Judge conducted a review of the Plaintiff's complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Magistrate Judge recommends dismissing the case against Defendant Clinton Perry, Jr. because the Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims upon which relief can be granted with regard to Defendant Perry. The Plaintiff did not file an Objection.

The Court has reviewed the Recommendation. The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in the Recommendation. Accordingly, all claims against Defendant Clinton Perry, Jr. are dismissed.

SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of February, 2012.

_________________________

MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Brown v. Perry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Brown v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BERNARD BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CLINTON PERRY and SUSAN KAPLAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:11-CV-447 (MTT) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 27, 2012)