From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 6, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1544 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1544 GEB KJM P.

February 6, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Petitioner is incarcerated in a jail in Rancho Cucamonga, in San Bernadino County, after a parole revocation proceeding which apparently occurred at that facility. This county is in an area embraced by the United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Because petitioner was not found to have violated his parole in this district, and is not presently confined here, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the application.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).


Summaries of

Brown v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 6, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1544 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2007)
Case details for

Brown v. People

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE O. BROWN, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 6, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1544 GEB KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2007)