From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2449 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2449 KJM P.

February 22, 2010


ORDER


Petitioner is an inmate who has consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned. He has filed a request for writ of mandate under California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085. Such a filing is not cognizable in this court, which is a federal court of limited jurisdiction. Therefore, this action is dismissed. Petitioner is advised that, generally speaking, there are two actions he can commence as a prisoner that pertain to issues concerning his incarceration. The first is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of civil rights. Petitioner may be able to bring a § 1983 action if his claim concerns conditions of confinement (e.g., healthcare, denial of access to basic human necessities, exposure to substantial risk of serious harm). He may be able to file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 if he has a claim challenging the fact that he is incarcerated or the length of his sentence.


Summaries of

Brown v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2010
No. CIV S-09-2449 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. People

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE BROWN, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2449 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)