From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 18, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-1361 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-1361.

September 18, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 18th day of Sept 2006, after the plaintiff filed a civil rights complaint in the above-captioned case, and after motions for summary judgment were submitted by the plaintiff and by the remaining defendants in this case, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 72) is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment submitted by remaining defendants Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey A. Beard, William Stickman, Lance Couturier, Fred Maue, Donald Williamson, Ronald Blandford, Neal Mechling, Louis Folino and Counselor Ivan (Docket No. 83) is granted, and judgment is entered accordingly.

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the F.R.App.P., if the plaintiff desires to appeal from this Order, he must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 F.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 18, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-1361 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2006)
Case details for

Brown v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL BROWN, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 18, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-1361 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2006)