From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Penner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 29, 2010
No. CIV S-05-1086 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-1086 MCE DAD P.

July 29, 2010


ORDER


On July 1, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel. On July 22, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties . . ." E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of July 1, 2010, is therefore untimely.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's July 22, 2010, request for reconsideration (Doc. No. 92) is denied.


Summaries of

Brown v. Penner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jul 29, 2010
No. CIV S-05-1086 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Brown v. Penner

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. M. PENNER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 29, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-05-1086 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2010)