From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Penner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
No. 2:05-cv-01086-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-01086-MCE-DAD P.

January 25, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 29, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Defendants have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 29, 2007 are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant's May 29, 2007 motion for summary judgment is denied.


Summaries of

Brown v. Penner

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 25, 2008
No. 2:05-cv-01086-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)
Case details for

Brown v. Penner

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. M. PENNER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-01086-MCE-DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2008)