From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Partipilo

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Mar 10, 2011
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:10cv110 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2011)

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:10cv110.

March 10, 2011


ORDER/OPINION


On the 9th day of March 2011, Plaintiffs filed their "Motion to File Reply" [Docket Entry 58]. Defendants have not yet filed a response to the Motion nor was any response due at the time of this Order.

For reasons appearing to the Court, Plaintiffs' Motion to File Reply is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the Reply, which counsel for Plaintiffs attached to the Motion.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record.

DATED: March 10, 2011.


Summaries of

Brown v. Partipilo

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Mar 10, 2011
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:10cv110 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Brown v. Partipilo

Case Details

Full title:LAEL BROWN, LAVERNE WRIGHT-OCHOA, CHARLES BROWNE, AND ROBERT WRIGHT…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Mar 10, 2011

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:10cv110 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2011)