From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown v. Osteopathic General Hospital

Supreme Court of Florida
May 8, 1968
209 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 37156.

May 8, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Edward Schroll, Miami, for petitioner, cross-respondent.

Gladson Knecht, Miami, for respondents, cross-petitioners.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for Florida Industrial Commission, respondent.


By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date January 4, 1968.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner and cross-respondent for attorney's fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

CALDWELL, C.J., and DREW, THORNAL, ERVIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brown v. Osteopathic General Hospital

Supreme Court of Florida
May 8, 1968
209 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Brown v. Osteopathic General Hospital

Case Details

Full title:JAMES B. BROWN, PETITIONER, CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. OSTEOPATHIC GENERAL…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 8, 1968

Citations

209 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 1968)